Supervisor: Milo Casagrande ()
Announced end of poll: 2010-12-15 24.00
Actual time poll closed: Thu Dec 16 2010 08:12:11 GMT+0100 (ora solare Europa occidentale)
Private poll (46 authorized voters)
Actual votes cast: 39
Number of winning candidates:
This poll implements proportional representation. The best-candidate criterion is used to identify each voter's preferred set of choices.
Condorcet completion rule:    (What is this?)
Schulze/Beatpath/CSSD
CIVS Ranked Pairs
MAM
Condorcet-IRV

Poll description

Elezione dei nuovi membri del Consiglio della Comunità italiana di Ubuntu.

Choices (in individual preference order)

  1. Paolo Sammicheli
  2. Luca Falavigna
  3. Flavia Weisghizzi
  4. Dario Cavedon
  5. Sergio Zanchetta

Winning set of choices

The apparent winner of this poll was the following set of choices:

  1. Paolo Sammicheli
  2. Luca Falavigna
  3. Flavia Weisghizzi
  4. Dario Cavedon

Preference matrix

There are 5 possible sets of 4 choices that can be formed by selecting from the 5 choices. Of these, 5 sets were considered thoroughly, comparing against the 5 nearby (similar) sets that differ in just one choice.

This is the voting preference matrix, reporting maximal valid proportional preferences. Fractions indicate nonproportional preferences, which help break ties in proportional preference.

  1.2.3.4.5.
1. (1,2,3,4)   -0.15 17.2 19.23 25.25
2. (1,2,3,5)   0.14 -18.23 18.21 25.25
3. (1,2,4,5)   0.12 0.1 -16.21 21.22
4. (1,3,4,5)   0.13 0.14 0.13 -17.21
5. (2,3,4,5)   0.1 0.1 0.14 0.15 -

Pairwise comparison

You can compare any two sets of choices. Just enter the numbers of the choices (from 1 to 5) in each set, with the numbers of one set's choices in the left column and the numbers of the other's in the right column.

Set 1Set 2

Nonproportional poll

The following gives the details of how the poll would have resulted if run on single choices, without proportional representation. This hypothetical poll defines the “individual preference order” used above.

Ranking of the choices

Winning choices are shown in bold.

1. Paolo Sammicheli  loses to Sergio Zanchetta by 10–25  (Not defeated in any contest vs. another choice)
2. Luca Falavigna  loses to Sergio Zanchetta by 13–23, loses to Paolo Sammicheli by 21–15
3. Flavia Weisghizzi  loses to Sergio Zanchetta by 12–20, loses to Luca Falavigna by 21–13
4. Dario Cavedon  loses to Sergio Zanchetta by 14–15, loses to Flavia Weisghizzi by 23–10
5. Sergio Zanchetta, loses to Dario Cavedon by 15–14

Result details

  1.2.3.4.5.
1. Paolo Sammicheli   -21 22 25 25
2. Luca Falavigna   15 -21 21 23
3. Flavia Weisghizzi   14 13 -23 20
4. Dario Cavedon   10 14 10 -15
5. Sergio Zanchetta   10 13 12 14 -

Ballot reporting was not enabled for this poll.

The following matrix shows the strength of the strongest beatpath connecting each pair of choices. Choice 1 is ranked above choice 2 if there is a stronger beatpath leading from 1 to 2 than any leading from 2 to 1.

  1.2.3.4.5.
1. Paolo Sammicheli   -21–15 22–14 25–10 25–10
2. Luca Falavigna   . -21–13 21–13 23–13
3. Flavia Weisghizzi   . . -23–10 20–12
4. Dario Cavedon   . . . -15–14
5. Sergio Zanchetta   . . . . -